WHY WE ARE HAPPY?

Dan Gilbert is a psychologist who claims that when a person don't get a objective of his or her life, like a job, a competition, pass an exam... After three or four months he is totally happy with the results. The inmune-psychologic system is responsible for that happiness which is called synthetic happiness. An example of that is Pete Best. He was the drummer ofe the beatles who was replaced by Ringo Starr, after some year a journalist asked him of that situation and he answered that he can say that he was part of the beatles, and it was honor for him.




A SPANISH EXAMPLE OF THIS PHENOMENON:

THE ORIGINS OF PLEASURE

The video we watched was about the price of the things, the value. 

For example the value of a t-shirt of a famous person that is very simple, probably people will pay a big amount of money for that nevertheless the same t-shirt in a shop people probably won't pay a lot only some euros. 

Another example was a clothe brand and other which hasn't got brand but are the same, people will pay 100 euros more only because it's original they think that they are better than the other one. This is something that most people think.

WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?

Neo is a computer who works for a company, but a night while he was working with his computer he receive some instructions that he follow. After that, coincide with trinity, that is a memeber of group which knows the reality. Neo accepts to know the reality, Morpheo shows him it and shows him that Matrix is the lie where they live and the world is controlled by robots. So when it looked that everyone were going to die, Neo go into Matrix to save, because he was the one.

 The relationship that exist in the cavern myth is what refers to Matrix in the film, the place or situation where people live. To go out of it in the myth you have to know the truth, in the film whith intelligence and being brave.

ETHICS AND FREE WILL

The text explains if we have free will or not with an example.

There are two cases, the first one is a driver who drive while he is drinking coffee and sending messages, when he runs down a child in a cross walk. The  second case is another driver who is driving the speed limit when a child appear in front of his car he runs down him unavoidably.

In this two cases is something that they didn't avoid, but the first case was a fail of the driver so, he is guilty, and in the second one wasn't a fail of the driver simply bad luck.